The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by McNiel, D. E.
* Articles by Fulton, F. M.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by McNiel, D. E.
* Articles by Fulton, F. M.
Am J Psychiatry 155:1097-1101, August 1998
©Copyright 1998 American Psychiatric Association


Regular Article

Management of Threats of Violence Under California's Duty-to-Protect Statute

Dale E. McNiel, Ph.D., Renée L. Binder, M.D., and Forrest M. Fulton, Ph.D.

OBJECTIVE: This is the first study to assess clinical practices under one of the new duty-to-protect statutes, some version of which has been passed in many states. In 1985, California enacted a statute enabling psychotherapists to limit their liability when a patient makes a serious threat of violence by 1) making reasonable efforts to warn the victim of the threat and 2) notifying local police. METHOD: The authors examined all duty-to-protect notifications over a 5-year period in San Francisco by reviewing police and court records. RESULTS: Police received only 337 notifications, typically made by nondoctoral staff members at public facilities such as psychiatric hospitals and crisis clinics. Patients most commonly directed their threats toward family members. Of the patients who made threats resulting in notifications, 51% had prior arrest records, and 14% had subsequent arrests. Only 52% of the patients who made threats were civilly committed. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that 1) clinicians rarely discharge the duty to protect in the manner specified by the law, 2) many patients whose threats result in notifications have extensive involvement with the criminal justice system, and 3) family intervention may have clinical relevance in many duty-to-protect situations. (Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:1097–1101)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. B. Pollard, M. W. Brook, and A. Shafer
Patient Threats Present an Ethical Dilemma for the Anesthesiologist
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1544 - 1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
D. E. McNiel, J. P. Eisner, and R. L. Binder
The Relationship Between Command Hallucinations and Violence
Psychiatr Serv, October 1, 2000; 51(10): 1288 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
M. G. Huber, R. Balon, L. A. Labbate, S. Brandt-Youtz, J. H. Hammer, and R. Mufti
A Survey of Police Officers' Experience With Tarasoff Warnings in Two States
Psychiatr Serv, June 1, 2000; 51(6): 807 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
S. G. Noffsinger and F. M. Saleh
Ideas of Reference About Newscasters
Psychiatr Serv, May 1, 2000; 51(5): 679 - 679.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1998 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org