The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Lynn, D. J.
* Articles by Vaillant, G. E.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Lynn, D. J.
* Articles by Vaillant, G. E.
Am J Psychiatry 155:163-171, February 1998
© 1998 American Psychiatric Association


Regular Article

Anonymity, Neutrality, and Confidentiality in the Actual Methods of Sigmund Freud: A Review of 43 Cases, 1907–1939

David J. Lynn, M.D., and George E. Vaillant, M.D.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this historical study was to examine the methods actually used by Sigmund Freud in his practice of psychoanalysis in his mature years (1907–1939) and to assess the relationship between these methods and Freud's published recommendations concerning anonymity, neutrality, and confidentiality. METHOD: The authors used both published and unpublished sources, including reports or autobiographies by analysands, letters by analysands, interviews of analysands, letters by Freud, published works by Freud, and clinical records of subsequent treatment. RESULTS: Information concerning Freud's actual methods was found in 43 cases, including 10 clinical psychoanalyses, 19 didactic analyses, and 14 with combined clinical and didactic purposes. These 43 cases probably encompassed a majority of Freud's psychoanalytic hours during these years. Deviations from Freud's recommendations were found to the following extent: for anonymity, 43 cases (100%); for neutrality, 37 cases (86%); for confidentiality, 23 cases (53%). In addition, there were significant extra-analytic relations between Freud and 31 of these analysands (72%). CONCLUSIONS: These results show a substantial disparity between Freud's recommendations and his actual methods. Freud's prescribed method, as defined by his recommendations, was not tested or used in his practice. Freud's actual method was never explicitly described in his writings and cannot be replicated. (Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:163–171)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
W.W. Meissner
The Problem of Self-Disclosure in Psychoanalysis
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, September 1, 2002; 50(3): 827 - 867.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
J. Graller, A. Nielsen, B. Garber, L. Glusberg Davison, L. Gable, and H. Seidenberg
Concurrent Therapies: a Model for Collaboration Between Psychoanalysts and Other Therapists
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 2001; 49(2): 587 - 606.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
V. SCHWARTZ
Freud's Practice of Psychoanalysis
Am J Psychiatry, June 1, 1999; 156(6): 978a - 979.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
W.W. Meissner
Neutrality, Abstinence, and the Therapeutic Alliance
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, December 1, 1998; 46(4): 1089 - 1128.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1998 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org