The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Kendler, K. S.
* Articles by Roy, M. A.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Kendler, K. S.
* Articles by Roy, M. A.

Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:1608-1614
Copyright © 1995 by American Psychiatric Association


REGULAR ARTICLES

Validity of a diagnosis of lifetime major depression obtained by personal interview versus family history

KS Kendler and MA Roy
Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond 23298- 0710, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnoses obtained by family history agree only modestly with those obtained through personal interview. If personal interview diagnoses are the "gold standard," these findings suggest that family history diagnoses have low validity. Here the authors take another perspective--to evaluate family history versus personal interview diagnoses of lifetime major depression by three independent validators. METHOD: In a large sample of female-female twin pairs and their parents (903 families) ascertained from a population-based twin register, all subjects were personally interviewed by using a modified Structured Clinical Interview for DMS-III-R. Family history diagnoses based on the Family History Research Diagnostic Criteria were obtained by questioning each participant about his or her relatives. By means of multiple regression, the powers of the personal interview and family history methods were compared to predict 1) future episodes of major depression in the twins, 2) neuroticism, and 3) familial aggregation of major depression. RESULTS: Agreement between diagnoses obtained by personal interview and family history was modest. After the presence or absence of a personal interview diagnosis of major depression was controlled for, a family history diagnosis of major depression significantly predicted future episodes of major depression, neuroticism (in five of six analyses), and familial aggregation of major depression (in four of six analyses). CONCLUSIONS: Although agreeing relatively poorly, diagnoses of lifetime major depression obtained by personal interview and family history both contained useful information about future episodes, personality, and familial liability to illness. A multimethod approach to assessment of psychiatric illness may maximize the validity of psychiatric diagnoses.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
M. M. Weissman, P. Wickramaratne, P. Adams, S. Wolk, H. Verdeli, and M. Olfson
Brief Screening for Family Psychiatric History: The Family History Screen
Arch Gen Psychiatry, July 1, 2000; 57(7): 675 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1995 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org