The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Perry, J. C.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Perry, J. C.

Am J Psychiatry 1992; 149:1645-1653
Copyright © 1992 by American Psychiatric Association


SPECIAL ARTICLES

Problems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders

JC Perry
Cambridge Hospital, Boston.

This article reviews evidence for the reliability and diagnostic concordance of structured-interview and self-report questionnaire methods for the diagnosis of personality disorders. The findings of nine studies that compared two or more axis II diagnostic instruments administered to the same groups of subjects are summarized. Across the eight studies with sufficient data, a summary of the overall diagnostic agreement between any two instruments yielded a low reliability (median kappa = 0.25) for making individual personality disorder diagnoses. Diagnostic concordance was lower between self-report questionnaire and interview methods than between interview methods. Comparing dimensional scores of different methods did not appreciably improve the level of agreement. The author concludes that current methods for making personality disorder diagnoses have high reliability but yield diagnoses that are not significantly comparable across methods beyond chance, which is not scientifically acceptable. Sources for the disagreement include variance due to different raters, interview occasions, data sources (self-report versus observer report), information bases obtained, and instrument sensitivity to state effects (e.g., mood). Serious problems in assessment validity may also arise from the yes/no format, which, despite probes for confirmatory examples, may fail to distinguish adequately between sporadic occurrences and longstanding patterns. Efforts should be made to improve and demonstrate the validity of axis II diagnostic methods. One route to increasing validity is to improve the clinical interview, because personality patterns are best revealed by the recurring patterns one finds when taking a systematic history.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FocusHome page
L. M. Koran M.D.
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Update for the Clinician
Focus, January 1, 2007; 5(3): 299 - 313.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FocusHome page
M. Bond and J. C. Perry
Long-Term Changes in Defense Styles With Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Depressive, Anxiety, and Personality Disorders
Focus, July 1, 2005; 3(3): 429 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. Bond and J. C. Perry
Long-Term Changes in Defense Styles With Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Depressive, Anxiety, and Personality Disorders
Am J Psychiatry, September 1, 2004; 161(9): 1665 - 1671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
J. Shedler
A New Language for Psychoanalytic Diagnosis
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 2002; 50(2): 429 - 456.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
N. Doidge, B. Simon, L. Brauer, D. C. Grant, M. First, J. Brunshaw, W. J. Lancee, A. Stevens, J. M. Oldham, and P. Mosher
Psychoanalytic Patients in the U.S., Canada, and Australia: I. DSM-III-R Disorders, Indications, Previous Treatment, Medications, and Length of Treatment
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 2002; 50(2): 575 - 614.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
D. Westen and J. Shedler
Revising and Assessing Axis II, Part I: Developing a Clinically and Empirically Valid Assessment Method
Am J Psychiatry, February 1, 1999; 156(2): 258 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
J. Shedler and D. Westen
Refining the Measurement of Axis II: A Q-Sort Procedure for Assessing Personality Pathology
Assessment, December 1, 1998; 5(4): 333 - 353.
[Abstract]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
T. F. Oltmanns and M. E. Strauss
Peer Assessment of Personality Traits and Pathology in Female College Students
Assessment, March 1, 1998; 5(1): 53 - 65.
[Abstract]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
S. Schafer and D. P. Nowlis
Personality Disorders Among Difficult Patients
Arch Fam Med, March 1, 1998; 7(2): 126 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
K. M. BROOME, K. KNIGHT, G. W. JOE, and D. D. SIMPSON
Evaluating the Drug-Abusing Probationer: Clinical Interview Versus Self-Administered Assessment
Criminal Justice and Behavior, December 1, 1996; 23(4): 593 - 606.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. G. Johnson, R. F. Bornstein, and M. F. Sherman
A Modwied Scoring Algorithm for the PDQ-R: Psychiatric Symptomatology and Substance Use in Adolescents with Personality Disorders
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 1996; 56(1): 76 - 89.
[Abstract]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1992 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org