The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Peselow, E. D.
* Articles by Fieve, R. R.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Peselow, E. D.
* Articles by Fieve, R. R.

Am J Psychiatry 1992; 149:1324-1334
Copyright © 1992 by American Psychiatric Association


SPECIAL ARTICLES

Melancholic/endogenous depression and response to somatic treatment and placebo

ED Peselow, MP Sanfilipo, C Difiglia and RR Fieve
New York University School of Medicine, Brooklyn.

OBJECTIVE: The authors' goals were to examine the effects of somatic treatment and placebo in patients with and without endogenous/melancholic depression. METHOD: Before entry into one of four trials of antidepressant drugs versus placebo, 231 patients were assessed as to whether they met Research Diagnostic Criteria for definite endogenous depression and/or DSM-III criteria for major depressive episode with melancholia. These patients were prospectively assessed for subsequent response to antidepressant treatment or placebo. Previous studies of the effect of endogenous/melancholic depression on treatment response were also reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 76 patients with DSM-III melancholia given active medication, 41 (54%) had a complete or partial response, but only 10 (23%) of the 44 patients with melancholia given placebo had a complete or partial response. Of the 76 depressed patients without melancholia given active medication, 46 (61%) had a complete or partial response, and 15 (43%) of the 35 depressed patients without melancholia given placebo had a complete or partial response. Moderately depressed patients with DSM-III melancholia had a significantly better response to active medication than did severely depressed patients with melancholia and showed the greatest difference between response to active medication and response to placebo. The results of the review of previous studies of the effect of endogenous/melancholic depression on treatment response were mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Depressed patients with melancholia were not particularly different from depressed patients without melancholia in their responses to antidepressant medication but did differ from patients without melancholia in their responses to active medication versus placebo, particularly if their depression was moderate and not severe. This suggests that patients with DSM-III melancholia may be unresponsive to nonsomatic treatments.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
G. Parker, K. Roy, and K. Eyers
Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Depression? Choose Horses for Courses
Am J Psychiatry, May 1, 2003; 160(5): 825 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. A. Posternak, M. Zimmerman, G. I. Keitner, and I. W. Miller
A Reevaluation of the Exclusion Criteria Used in Antidepressant Efficacy Trials
Am J Psychiatry, February 1, 2002; 159(2): 191 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1992 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org