The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Appelbaum, P. S.
* Articles by Jorgenson, L.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Appelbaum, P. S.
* Articles by Jorgenson, L.

Am J Psychiatry 1991; 148:1466-1473
Copyright © 1991 by American Psychiatric Association


SPECIAL ARTICLES

Psychotherapist-patient sexual contact after termination of treatment: an analysis and a proposal

PS Appelbaum and L Jorgenson
Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.

Controversy over the legitimate extent, if any, of sexual contact between psychotherapists and former patients remains intense. In this paper the authors review current approaches to controlling posttermination sexual contact, offer a conceptual framework within which the problematic aspects of therapist-patient sex both during and after treatment can be understood, and develop a set of recommendations for policies that balance the goals of protecting former patients and avoiding unnecessary interventions into consensual relationships. Review of ethical, legal, and administrative controls on posttermination sex revealed considerable heterogeneity of approaches, which appeared to be based on confusion concerning the rationale for restriction. An analysis of the problems with therapist-patient sexual contact suggests four areas of concern: impaired decision making, coercion, fraud, and exploitation of a fiduciary relationship. The nature and magnitude of these problems differ in pre- and posttermination sexual relationships. The authors conclude that clarity of restrictions on posttreatment sex is important, but an absolute ban is not essential to protecting former patients. Rather, a 1-year waiting period after termination, during which even social contact would be precluded, should minimize problems and allow former patients and therapists to enter into intimate relationships. The authors discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this approach over other approaches.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
R. Walker and J. J. Clark
Heading Off Boundary Problems: Clinical Supervision as Risk Management
Psychiatr Serv, November 1, 1999; 50(11): 1435 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
W. A. Fisher and E. Goldsmith
Principles Underlying a Model Policy on Relationships Between Staff and Service Recipients in a Mental Health System
Psychiatr Serv, November 1, 1999; 50(11): 1447 - 1452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1991 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org