The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 123:1505-1512, June 1967
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.123.12.1505
© 1967 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by GUY, W.
* Articles by DENNIS, H.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by GUY, W.
* Articles by DENNIS, H.

An Alternative to the Double Blind Procedure

WILLIAM GUY PH.D.1, MARTIN GROSS M.D.2, , and HELEN DENNIS B.A.2

1 Program Coordinator, Biometric Laboratory, George Washington University, 1145 19th St. N. W., Washington, D. C. 20036
2 Research Department, Springfield State Hospital, Sykesville, Md.

Therapists' bias may influence the assessment of treatment results even when the procedure purports to be a blind one. The authors advocate the employment of an independent assessment team (IAT) as an alternative to the classical double blind technique. They feel the IAT serves as an additional control over therapist bias and permits the use of modified double blind procedures in a variety of research situations.







Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1967 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org