The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 122:798-805, January 1966
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.122.7.798
© 1966 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by SHATTAN, S. P.
* Articles by WOLFF, R. J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by SHATTAN, S. P.
* Articles by WOLFF, R. J.

GROUP TREATMENT OF CONDITIONALLY DISCHARGED PATIENTS IN A MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC

SAMUEL P. SHATTAN M.D.1, LUAN DCAMP R.N., M.S.1, EMI FUJII M.S.1, G. G. FROSS M.S.1, , and ROBERT J. WOLFF M.S.1

1 Mental Health Center, State of Illinois Department of Mental Health, 2449 West Washington Boulevard, Chicago, Ill.

Current literature has explored the possibilities of the use of the group approach to the treatment of state hospital patients who have been discharged to a mental health clinic for outpatient care. This paper deals with a method employed by a psychiatric team in the management of such patients. The rationale for the use of the group approach took a number of factors into account: 1) It is felt by some that a one-to-one relationship is particularly threatening for more severely ill patients. The group approach reduces the intensity of this relationship. 2) Some patients with ego weakness tend to acquire strength by identification with the group. 3) Patients in our groups are seen for a longer period of time than would normally be allotted to them during the brief, stereotyped, drug renewal interviews that usually constitute patient aftercare. 4) The group interaction offers a more variegated sampling of behavior on which to base clinical appraisals. 5) Seeing patients in groups is felt to be more efficient than seeing the same number of patients individually.

A psychiatric team used an approach employing an initial orientation meeting for an experimental sample of 45 conditionally discharged patients and their relatives, followed by monthly group treatment sessions for the patients. This experimental sample was compared with a control sample of 45 patients who did not receive group treatment, seen during the same time period and matched for age, sex, race, marital status and diagnosis.

The results of our study were obtained by comparing these two groups of patients for the following variables: return to hospital, significant at .05 level; receiving of absolute discharge, significant at .01 level; number of clinic contacts, significant at .01 level; mean number of months out of hospital, trend; chronicity, trend; employment after a year, not significant; receipt of medication, not significant.

We feel, therefore, that the findings of this study show that the group approach bears wider application in improving outpatient programs for an ever-increasing population of ex-hospital patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
D. Scott and M. Griffith
The Evaluation of Group Therapy in the Treatment of Schizophrenia
Small Group Research, August 1, 1982; 13(3): 415 - 422.





Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1966 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org