The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 121:1043-1048, May 1965
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.121.11.1043
© 1965 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by THOMPSON, G. N.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by THOMPSON, G. N.

POST-TRAUMATIC PSYCHONEUROSIS—A STATISTICAL SURVEY

GEORGE N. THOMPSON M.D.1

1 2010 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, Calif. 90075

1. Five hundred cases that were diagnosed "post-traumatic psychoneurosis" were studied statistically with regard to the following variables: a. Variables of historical data, b. Variables of objective signs, c. Variables of symptom complexes, d. Variables of course of the disorder, and e. Variables of results of therapy. 2. Controls consisted of non-traumatically induced psychoneuroses and neurologically injured patients who did not develop psychoneuroses. 3. Definitions are given to clarify a subject that has been confusing to both the medical and the legal professions. 4. Differential diagnostic problems are presented, with a classification of psychogenic factors in other syndromes sometimes found post-traumatically. 5. A series of legal questions compiled from legal examinations and cross-examinations of psychiatrists at hearings and in courts are presented for study. 6. Post-traumatic psychoneurosis is probably the most misunderstood condition that occurs in medico-legal cases, and to make it understood to judges, referees, commissioners and juries, as well as to attorneys and doctors, it must be made tangible, clearly-cut, definite and therefore diagnostically valid. These diagnostic criteria eliminate the arguments of objective versus subjective, for everything in medicine is both objective and subjective.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
U. Schnyder, H. Moergeli, R. Klaghofer, T. Sensky, and S. Buchi
Does Patient Cognition Predict Time Off From Work After Life-Threatening Accidents?
Am J Psychiatry, November 1, 2003; 160(11): 2025 - 2031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1965 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org