The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 118:311-322, October 1961
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.118.4.311
© 1961 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by WING, J. K.
* Articles by FREUDENBERG, R. K.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by WING, J. K.
* Articles by FREUDENBERG, R. K.

THE RESPONSE OF SEVERELY ILL CHRONIC SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENTS TO SOCIAL STIMULATION

J. K. WING M.D., PH.D., D.P.M.1, and R. K. FREUDENBERG M.D., D.P.M.2

1 Institue of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London S.E. 5, England.
2 Physician Superintendent, Netherne Hospital, Coulsdon Surrey, England.

Twenty-two long-stay severely ill male schizophrenic patients were employed in a hospital workshop for 16 weeks. They all lived in one villa where the standard of social treatment was high. The two workshop supervisors were a male and a female staff nurse. The sex of the supervisor did not influence the results. The conditions of supervision were varied experimentally. There was a sharp increase in output (on a simple sleeve folding task) whenever social incentives were introduced, and a sharp fall whenever passive conditions of supervision were resumed. The 10 patients with the highest initial output, together with 1 other (ranked 13 on initial output), accounted for over 90% of the output under passive conditions, and for all the improvement due to practice. However, they contributed only 40% of the improvement due to additional social incentives. The remaining patients, therefore, functioned at a very low level relative to the initially high scorers and showed no practice effect, but 7 of them responded very markedly to encouragement. Time-sampling of workshop behaviour showed that the increase in working activity, under active conditions of supervision, was accompanied by a significant decrease in various abnormalities of behaviour (immobility, mannerisms and restlessness). Ward behaviour was unaffected.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
A. Sovani and S. Thatte
Effects of Psychosocial Interventions On Motor Speed and Accuracy of Chronic Positive, Negative, and Mixed Symptom Schizophrenics
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, June 1, 1998; 44(2): 117 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
K. Bridges, P. Huxley, and J. Oliver
Psychiatric Rehabilitation: Redefined for the 1990s
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, March 1, 1994; 40(1): 1 - 16.
[PDF]


Home page
Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
D. Hollander, V. Bapuji Rao, E. McManoman, N. Harrington, A. Weeks, and A. Mann
Socialisation Scheme With a High Staff-Patient Ratio: A Controlled Study
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, December 1, 1981; 27(4): 243 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1961 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org