The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 112:678-683, March 1956
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.112.9.678
© 1956 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by RINALDI, F.
* Articles by HIMWICH, H. E.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by RINALDI, F.
* Articles by HIMWICH, H. E.

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF AZACYCLONOL, CHLORPROMAZINE, AND RESERPINE ON A GROUP OF CHRONIC PSYCHOTIC PATIENTS

FRANCO RINALDI M. D.1, L H. RUDY M. D.2, , and H. E. HIMWICH M. D.2

1 The Thudichum Psychiatric Research Laboratory, Galesburg State Research Hospital., Fulbright Fellow, on leave from the Clinic for the Diseases of the Nervous System of the University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
2 The Thudichum Psychiatric Research Laboratory, Galesburg State Research Hospital.

1. Clinical evaluations of azacyclonol, reserpine, and chlorpromazine were made in turn on the same group of chronic, moderately disturbed, psychotic patients, most of whom revealed schizophrenic reactions maintained through long hospitalization.

2. Beneficial results were obtained with each of the 3 drugs, but not necessarily in the same patients; nor were all patients helped by any one drug.

3. Consideration of the total number of patient improvements in our limited series showed reserpine to be best, closely followed by chlorpromazine, and then by azacyclonol.

4. From the analysis of the results in relation to the different diagnostic categories, it would seem that the hebephrenic and hebephreno-catatoonic patients were helped most by reserpine, next came azacyclonol, while chlorpromazine was least effective. In the treatment of paranoid patients chlorpromazine was most beneficial, followed by reserpine, and then by azacyclonol. The schizo-affective patients exhibited best improvement with chlorpromazine. One case of involutional depression was strikingly benefited by reserpine.

5. Limiting the validity of these conclusions to the types of patients studied we find that it is possible to differentiate between the use of each of these drugs in different psychiatric categories and to indicate the choice of drug that may prove most useful in the treatment of a given case.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
H. E. Himwich
Psychopharmacologic Drugs
Science, January 10, 1958; 127(3289): 59 - 72.
[PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1956 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org