The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 112:795-802, April 1956
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.112.10.795
© 1956 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by ULETT, G. A.
* Articles by GLESER, G. C.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by ULETT, G. A.
* Articles by GLESER, G. C.

EVALUATION OF CONVULSIVE AND SUBCONVULSIVE SHOCK THERAPIES UTILIZING A CONTROL GROUP

GEORGE A. ULETT M. D., PH. D., KATHLEEN SMITH M. D., , and GOLDINE C. GLESER PH. D.1

1 The Department of Psychiatry and Neurology Washington University School of Medicine and the Research Laboratories of Malcolm Bliss Hospital, St. Louis, Mo.

1. Convulsive photoshock is an effective treatment procedure.

2. The convulsive seizure, whether produced by electric or photo-chemical means, has therapeutic value in the treatment of affective psychosis.

3. Periods of induced paroxysmal brain wave activity alone ( subconvulsive treatment) without subsequent convulsion resulted in no improvement beyond that produced by the psychotherapeutic effect of routine hospital care.

4. The amount of postshock confusion is not related to recovery and clouds the picture when immediate evaluation of treatment is desired. Postshock confusion was less frequently noted after photoshock than after an equal number of electroshock treatments.

5. Fear of treatment did not play a role in producing remission from psychotic symptoms.

6. Evidence is discussed suggesting that convulsions produced by different means may have different modes of action in the central nervous system thus accounting for differences in recovery rate, degree of alteration of convulsive threshold, and amount of mental confusion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FocusHome page
D. Pagnin, V. de Queiroz, S. Pini, and G. B. Cassano
Efficacy of ECT in Depression: A Meta-Analytic Review
Focus, January 1, 2008; 6(1): 155 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
A. D. Krystal, M. D. Dean, R. D. Weiner, L. A. Tramontozzi III, K. M. Connor, V. H. Lindahl, and R. W. Massie
ECT Stimulus Intensity: Are Present ECT Devices Too Limited?
Am J Psychiatry, June 1, 2000; 157(6): 963 - 967.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1956 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org