The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 109:677-683, March 1953
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.109.9.677
© 1953 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by ROHRER, J. H.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by ROHRER, J. H.

THE RESEARCH TEAM CONCEPT AND THE CULTURAL PATTERN OF SCIENCE

JOHN H. ROHRER PH. D.1

1 Director, Urban Life Research Institute, and Professor of Psychology, Tulane University.

1. The most important cultural influence affecting research methods used to study human social behavior is the cultural pattern labeled science.

2. One essential aspect of this culture pattern called science is theory. Failure to keep explicit the theoretical framework within which one works makes more probable the development of distorted perceptions and resulting erroneous beliefs as to the nature of the scientific description being attempted.

3. There are several distinctive, but equally valid, levels at which scientific descriptions can be made. The "truth" of statements, made at any of these descriptive levels, is given solely by the accuracy and consistency with which they describe the phenomena under question.

4. The problem of understanding the relations holding between variables under study is complicated when these distinctive levels, as such, are not recognized.

5. Successful attempts to interrelate the findings made at various scientific descriptive levels are dependent upon the use of coordinating definitions between levels. This fact is most important since its recognition may eliminate many of the misunderstandings and complications in communicating between the members of the various disciplines represented.

6. Variables that are independent and manipulated at one level may become, when introduced at another level, dependent variables. In a discussion between members of various disciplines, each should make explicit the status of the variables at their level of description and the coordinating definitions that relate their variables to variables at other levels of descriptions if they are to achieve effective communication between workers in the various disciplines.

7. The primary interaction task of the research team is to work out multidisciplinary coordinating definitions that provide explicit ways of integrating the knowledge obtained at different descriptive levels for purposes of describing human behavior more completely.







Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1953 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org