The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 107:221-224, September 1950
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.107.3.221
© 1950 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by CHAPMAN, W. P.
* Articles by SOLOMON, H. C.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by CHAPMAN, W. P.
* Articles by SOLOMON, H. C.

A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF MOTOR WITHDRAWAL REACTION TO HEAT DISCOMFORT IN PATIENTS BEFORE AND AFTER FRONTAL LOBOTOMY

WILLIAM P. CHAPMAN M. D.1, AUGUSTUS S. ROSE M. D.2, , and HARRY C. SOLOMON M. D.3

1 Instructor in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and Assistant in Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
2 Instructor in Neurology and Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and Associate in Therapeutic Research, Boston Psychopathic Hospital, Boston, Mass.
3 Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and Medical Director, Boston Psychopathic Hospital, Boston, Mass.

1. A second-year follow-up study has been made of the intensity of heat stimulus causing motor withdrawal reaction in lobotomized patients. Measured amounts of heat were applied to the forehead by the Hardy-Wolff-Goodell pain threshold apparatus. The endpoints of motor withdrawal were the levels of heat causing the patient (1) to pull the head away from the apparatus and (2) to wince. Thirteen of the 23-patients originally tested were included in this study.

2. The results of the 13-24 months' follow-up test indicate that the decreased tolerance to heat discomfort noted in lobotomized patients during the first year after operation probably represented only a temporary change after lobotomy.

3. We have no adequate explanation either for the decreased tolerance to heat discomfort during the first postoperative year or for the tendency of the motor reaction pattern to return to the preoperative levels during the second postoperative year. A reasonable speculation could be that transection of the white matter in the frontal lobes removes a mechanism that inhibits withdrawal from discomfort. With the passage of time, some other mechanism in the central nervous system may take over such a role, which was previously the concern of the frontal lobes.







Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1950 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org