The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 105:15-27, July 1948
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.105.1.15
© 1948 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by BOWMAN, K. M.
* Articles by SIMON, A.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* Articles by BOWMAN, K. M.
* Articles by SIMON, A.

STUDIES IN ELECTRONARCOSIS THERAPY

I. Clinical Evaluation

KARL M. BOWMAN M. D., and ALEXANDER SIMON M. D.1

1 The Langley Porter Clinic and the Division of Psychiatry of the University of California Medical School.

1. Electronarcosis has been administered to a group of 53 mentally ill persons. The results of follow-up studies one month after treatment was completed may be summarized as follows: 37 cases of schizophrenia were treated, 7 recovered; 9 cases of psychoneurosis were treated, none recovered; 7 cases of manic-depressive psychosis were treated, 2 recovered. However, if one includes only cases that received 7 or more treatments, the results one month after treatment would read as follows: 31 cases of schizophrenia were treated, 5 recovered; 5 cases of psychoneurosis were treated, none recovered; 4 cases of manic-depressive psychosis were treated, 1 recovered.

2. Of the 5 schizophrenic patients who received 7 or more treatments and recovered, improvement was noted at some time between the second to seventh treatment.

3. It is our impression that electronarcosis is of no value in the treatment of psychoneurotics, is certainly no better than electroshock in treating the manic-depressive psychoses, and is equal to electroshock in the treatment of schizophrenia. Our series are too small for any definite conclusions to be drawn, and the above estimation of the value of electronarcosis therapy is subject to revision after we have treated a larger series of cases.

4. Fractures of the spine occurred in 15 of the 53 patients treated, amounting to 28.3% of the cases. This percentage can be greatly reduced by the use of sodium amytal or by the new Glissando technique recently developed by Tietz.

5. Because of the extreme rise in blood pressure that occurs during treatment, electronarcosis should not be used on patients with hypertension or cardiac disease.

6. Electronarcosis is a more dangerous treatment than electroshock and is less simple to administer.







Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1948 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org