0
Get Alert
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
You must sign in to sign-up for alerts.

Please confirm that your email address is correct, so you can successfully receive this alert.

1
Letters to the Editor   |    
Dr. Perlis and Colleagues Reply
ROY H. PERLIS; ANDREW A. NIERENBERG
Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:1111-1111.
text A A A

To the Editor: We thank Dr. Montgomery for highlighting the important work of his group. As he is well aware, compiling and abstracting clinical trials requires numerous assumptions about study outcome. Likewise, the analyses of association between funding source and outcome require further assumptions, most notably that competing interests are reported consistently. Other issues are more subtle: Should any author with a competing interest or only the first author be considered? Does any kind of support, such as free medication, confer the same risk? Published studies vary somewhat in their application of these definitions.

Nonetheless, what is clear from the body of evidence is that the relationship between funding source, competing interests, and reported outcome is one that we need to understand better. Having shown that associations exist, the task now is to clarify why that might be and what, if anything, might be done about it.

+

References

+
+

CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of APA editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe