Get Alert
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
You must sign in to sign-up for alerts.

Please confirm that your email address is correct, so you can successfully receive this alert.

Letter to the Editor   |    
Dr. Stotland Replies
Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:305-a-305. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.2.305-a
text A A A

To the Editor: Dr. Kal raises a thought-provoking question: how far ought we to go in pursuing our duty to heal? The woman whose religious beliefs led her to choose to die rather than to accept a blood transfusion was willing to back her values with her very life. She knew that her children would grow up without a mother, but she expected that they all, after a relatively brief sojourn in this life, would be rejoined in heaven for eternity. Her decision directly affected no one else. But the "frustrated caregivers," in order to carry out their value of healing by administering a blood transfusion to this competent and unwilling woman, would have intruded on the autonomy and physical integrity of their patient. Would that not have violated their duty to do no harm?




CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of APA editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe

Related Content
Dulcan's Textbook of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry > Chapter 40.  >
Gabbard's Treatments of Psychiatric Disorders, 4th Edition > Chapter 54.  >
Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury, 2nd Edition > Chapter 25.  >
Dulcan's Textbook of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry > Chapter 39.  >
Dulcan's Textbook of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry > Chapter 39.  >
Topic Collections
Psychiatric News