The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

Medicine court: Rogers in practice

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.144.1.62

The authors conducted a prospective study of the impact of the Rogers decision involving patients' right to refuse treatment during the first year (1983-1984) of its implementation in the Massachusetts facility for the criminally insane. They learned that of the 98 cases submitted to the probate court, only 39 were heard. The court found that 35 (90%) of the 39 patients whose cases were heard lacked competence to make treatment decisions. Hearings occurred 2-7 months after petitions were signed by treating physicians. In arriving at the decisions the court appeared to rely more on reports of violent incidents than on evidence of mental illness or testimony about competence.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.