A Social Philosopher Looks at the Death Penalty
Abstract
Today the death penalty provides the philosopher not so much with the task of debating its retention but rather with an occasion for explaining its virtual abolition. Public opposition, the position of the federal government, the accumulation of sociological and penological evidence against the doctrine of deterrence and in favor of a tolerable alternative—all these have been factors. Nevertheless, there are some questions of special philosophical interest which the death penalty does raise. Among them is: How should our thinking about punishment and the justifiable use of violence be guided by the doctrines of the Sanctity of Life and the Right to Life?
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
