Get Alert
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
You must sign in to sign-up for alerts.

Please confirm that your email address is correct, so you can successfully receive this alert.

Articles   |    
Am J Psychiatry 1965;122:546-554.
View Author and Article Information

Resident in Psychiatry, Ontario Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario

Department of Psychiatry, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio

1966 by The American Psychiatric Association

text A A A
PDF of the full text article.

Unilateral electrode placement over the dominant hemisphere has recently been shown to avoid memory disturbance after ECT while retaining therapeutic efficacy(4, 9, 10). However, the only controls used were patients on bilateral ECT and, therefore, these studies did not conclusively show the role played by dominance. Furthermore, dominance was not established by detailed testing in any of the previous papers.The present experiment answers these questions by using as controls, patients who received unilateral ECT on their dominant hemisphere, and by the use of a special test battery to establish the preferred laterality for hand, leg and eye. Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive ECT either over the dominant or over the minor hemisphere. Electrodes were placed as described by Lancaster; otherwise standard, modified ECT was employed. Memory was tested with the Wechsler Memory Scale before the first ECT and after the fifth treatment.Drug intake was restricted during the study. Patients were chosen for ECT by their regular physician, but included in the study only if they had not received ECT within the last year, and if they had no evidence of neurological brain damage.The mean scores and standard deviations for each group of 14 patients were calculated. There was no significant difference in scores before ECT, but the second test showed a decrease of 8.1 percent in the group receiving ECT on the dominant side, while the patients with electrode placement over the nondominant hemisphere had an increase in their score of 10.6 percent.Analysis of variance for repeated measures was applied. The interaction effect of shock treatment and the dominance factor was significant beyond the .001 level. The effects of shock treatment and the dominance factor when considered individually were not significant. Thus the results conclusively show that only electrode placement over the dominant hemisphere is associated with memory loss, and that memory disturbance cannot be avoided simply by unilateral electrode placement regardless of dominance.ECT need no longer be accompanied by memory disturbance. More detailed testing for dominance, such as the battery employed in this study, can guide the psychiatrist in preventing this disturbing side effect. With the substantiation of other appropriate tests the design of this study can serve to elucidate asymmetrical localization of mental functions other than verbal memory, as well as to delineate variations to be expected in ambidextrous and left-handed patients.

Abstract Teaser
Figures in this Article

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In to Access Full Content
Sign in via Athens (What is this?)
Athens is a service for single sign-on which enables access to all of an institution's subscriptions on- or off-site.
Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now/Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing PsychiatryOnline@psych.org or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).




CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of APA editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe

Web of Science® Times Cited: 59

Related Content
Gabbard's Treatments of Psychiatric Disorders, 4th Edition > Chapter 27.  >
Gabbard's Treatments of Psychiatric Disorders, 4th Edition > Chapter 12.  >
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Geriatric Psychiatry, 4th Edition > Chapter 15.  >
DSM-5™ Clinical Cases > Chapter 8.  >
Dulcan's Textbook of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry > Chapter 52.  >
Topic Collections
Psychiatric News
Read more at Psychiatric News >>
APA Guidelines
PubMed Articles