The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.119.3.222

The authors interviewed 185 individuals at 11 army posts to gather data on performance level of 13 soldiers who developed overtly schizophrenic psychoses after at least one year of service in the army. The level of work performance and the development of overt psychotic symptoms depended on the type of relationship established with significant other persons. Three types of relationships were distinguished: quasitherapeutic, pseudotherapeutic, and contratherapeutic.

The quasitherapeutic relationship is one in which the significant other conveyed to the patient a feeling of acceptance as a person and an expectation of behavior in accordance with group norms, i. e., he both provided support and set limits. In the pseudotherapeutic relationship the significant other, who seemed to obtain some gratification from having the patient dependent upon him, provided solely support. Rigid expectations of work performance without any emotional support was characteristic of the significant other in the contratherapeutic relationship.

Information from those who knew him indicated that the patient did adequate, sometimes even outstanding work in the quasitherapeutic relationship. This relationship was disrupted when either the patient or the significant other was transferred to another post. In the pseudotherapeutic relationship the patient continually made greater demands for support and his work preformance progressively deteriorated. In the contratherapeutic relationship the patient rapidly developed overtly psychotic symptoms. Both the pseudotherapeutic and contratherapeutic relationships led to hospitalization.

It has been pointed out by a number of authors (Nathan Ackerman, Gregory Bateson, Don Jackson, Adelaide Johnson, Erich Lindemann, and Stanley Szurek) that deviant behavior of an individual may represent psychopathology of the family group. The data gathered in this study indicate that groups other than the family can be pathogenic. Psychiatric attention to the family of a patient has both contributed to understanding of the development of psychopathology and led to new therapeutic methods. Extending this interest to the patient's relationships in his work and social groups may produce similar results.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.