The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
ArticleNo Access

PSYCHIATRY, NATURE AND SCIENCE

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.117.3.205

It is a purpose of philosophic analysis to clarify the meaning of concepts used in scientific discourse. An attempt to do so has been made here, with special reference to the value-terms used in psychiatry. Such terms as "mental health," "mental illness," "normal," "abnormal," "neurosis," "psychosis," "perversion," "psychopathic" or "sociopathic" personality have been subject to scrutiny. It has been shown that such terms cannot be defined scientifically. Therefore, it is suggested either that they not be used or that a precise statement of the basis of their use in any given case be made. Such attention to our use of language will bring rewards both in the clarity of our discourse and in the elimination of issues hitherto considered unsolved problems of science.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.