A recent series of such studies has focused on psychotic symptoms measured in late childhood and early adolescence. The article by Arseneault et al. in this issue (1) reports on a study of a large twin sample from the general population that has previously been used for such research. The study investigated the shared impact of two strong risk factors for psychotic symptoms identified at age 12 in some children—abuse by adults and bullying by peers in preschool and school-age children. The authors view these risks as two versions of trauma resulting from an "intention to harm" directed toward the child. Both of these risks have been identified as related to or predictive of other mental disorders, including antisocial personality disorder. Here the authors show that the association with psychotic symptoms is independent of genetic vulnerability (as indicated by maternal psychosis or estimated twin symptom risk level), symptoms of internalizing or externalizing disorders, and IQ, as well as socioeconomic deprivation status, which itself is associated with both "intention to harm" risks. The authors suggest that a child's reaction to experiences of "intention to harm" may include psychotic symptoms. The authors' thorough examination of the combined effects of different environmental traumas also attributed a marginally significant increase in risk to a history of serious accidental injury. Some such "accidents" may have reflected parental negligence or worse. Despite the authors' meticulous evaluation of the child-reported symptoms, they could not assess whether the children's psychotic symptoms represented a reaction to potential threats or self-protective strategies against these threats. A similar study (2) also showed a dose-response relationship between the level of psychotic symptoms and the severity of bullying victimization in children. Together, these new studies provide evidence of the distressing, long-lasting effects of early adverse experiences in children at the hands of their peers and caretakers.