To The Editor: I appreciate the Clinical Case Conference by Gabrielle Hobday, M.D., Lisa Mellman, M.D., and Glen O. Gabbard, M.D. (1), published in the December 2008 issue of the Journal. Dr. Hobday is clearly a gifted therapist, and Dr. Gabbard’s supervision was wise. Unfortunately, the treatment used in the case presentation was not successful. Given the problems the patient posed, failure may have been inevitable. However, I would like to share some thoughts about managing difficult transference.
Before starting dynamic psychotherapy, especially with an individual for whom there may be “warning signs” that transference might be confusing (as with Dr. Hobday’s patient), I educate the patient about the process, goals, and possible pitfalls to be expected (2). Usually, the patient and I have decided to undertake psychotherapy because we believe there is a psychological component to his or her suffering, which manifests itself as troublesome patterns in the patient’s life. I explain that dynamic therapy works by looking deeply at how the patient experiences his or her life, especially in the realm of feelings, in order to understand how these patterns began, how they made sense at one time, and how to change them.
I usually explain that therapy focuses on the following three realms: current relationships, important past relationships, and, sometimes, the relationship with the therapist. When the relationship with the therapist is a focus of interest, we need to attend to two important aspects of our relationship. The first is the real, actual relationship. For example, if the therapist is chronically late, that would be a real factor in the relationship to address. The other aspect is the transference relationship. This—I explain to the patient—occurs when important feelings from the patient’s past come into the relationship with the therapist. Transference presents an opportunity to scrutinize and understand these feelings in the therapy. However, these feelings that arise in the relationship with the therapist can promote the occurrence of the same self-destructive patterns in therapy that occur in the rest of the patient’s life. Therefore, I tell the patient in advance that it is critical that when the transference arises (if it does) that both the therapist and the patient recognize it and deal with it effectively.
Thus, when transference arises (as it did for Dr. Hobday in her patient’s diary), we can say, “Mr. A, do you remember our discussion about transference? Well, this is it!”
This preparation sometimes creates a cognitive framework to “hold” the therapy while the patient and therapist collaboratively develop a way to use the transference rather than have the transference explode the therapy. Whether this approach would have been helpful in Dr. Hobday’s particular case is, of course, not clear.
I congratulate Dr. Hobday on her courageous willingness to share her work and am thankful that our field is graced with new practitioners of such intelligence and openness who are capable of such candid self-reflection.
1.Hobday G, Mellman L, Gabbard GO: Complex sexualized transferences when the patient is male and the therapist female. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165:1525–15302.Gordon C, Riess H: The formulation as a collaborative conversation. Harvard Rev Psychiatry 2005; 13:112–123
The author reports no competing interests.
This letter (doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08121898) was accepted for publication in February 2009.