The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

Criterion and predictive validity of the diagnosis of adjustment disorder: a prospective study of youths with new-onset insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.152.4.523

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the criterion and predictive validity of the diagnosis of adjustment disorder in a pediatric study group. METHOD: Ninety-two school-age children with new-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were evaluated repeatedly and were diagnosed by using DSM-III. The criteria for adjustment disorder were further operationalized by requiring four clinically significant symptoms or signs; the time frame for its onset was extended to 6 months after the diagnosis of insulin-dependent diabetes. Predictive validity was assessed in terms of new psychiatric disorders other than adjustment disorder during the next 5 years. RESULTS: Of the 92 children, 33 developed adjustment disorder and five developed other psychiatric disorders in response to the diagnosis of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Mean time from diabetes diagnosis to onset of adjustment disorder was 29 days, the average episode length was 3 months, and the recovery rate was 100%. Among youths with adjustment disorder in response to the medical diagnosis, the 5-year cumulative probability of a new psychiatric disorder was 0.48, compared to 0.16 among the other youths. CONCLUSIONS: The findings generally support the criterion validity of the diagnosis of adjustment disorder. However, episode duration and the predictive validity of the diagnosis appear to be functions of the study group being examined. In nonpsychiatrically referred pediatric patients, early problems in adaptation to the stress of changed health status, as evidenced by adjustment disorder, appear to signal vulnerability to later psychopathology.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.