Effect of the Rennie decision on private hospitalization in New Jersey: two case reports
Abstract
The Rennie decision in New Jersey on the right to refuse treatment has been extended from public mental health programs to private psychiatric hospitals where conditions are very different from those which engendered the decision. This ripple effect may result in therapeutic delay, increased cost, possible general medical neglect, family turmoil, and misuse or loss of insurance benefits. The two cases described by the author resulted in expenditures of more than $30,000 by the patients and their insurers. The author criticizes the policy of using independent psychiatrists to review treatment in private hospitals. He believes that if the right to refuse treatment is maintained, prompt judicial review without prior restraining orders should be public policy.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
