The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

Utilization review of treatment for suicide attempters

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.132.1.22

The authors describe an effort to develop criteria for utilization review of treatment for suicide attempters. Explicit criteria proposed by a panel of experts as essential determinants for hospitalization of these patients were compared with actual clinical practice. It was found that according to the experts' criteria (which were operationalized into rating assessments), over half of the outpatient sample should have been hospitalized. After multiple regression analysis was carried out on the criteria, however, four predictors showed that only 20 percent of the outpatients should have been hospitalized. The authors discuss the issues these findings raise about the criteria of the experts, their utility for research, their validity, and their implications for utilization review.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.