The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.126.5.611

Psychotherapeutic intervention on one side or another in a marriage when divorce is being considered may serve to destroy the possibility of reconciliation. Despite the therapist's efforts to remain neutral, he inevitably finds himself thrust into the role of catalyst, judge, or "alternate mate." The authors suggest the inclusion of both partners, as well as children and perhaps other family members, in the therapeutic situation as one means of avoiding an outcome that may ultimately prove detrimental to all.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.