Several lines of research support the hippocampus playing a role in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. The hippocampus is intricately involved in declarative learning and memory (1—3), novelty detection (4, 5), and establishing semantic associations (6), such that functional deficits can resemble cognitive abnormalities seen in schizophrenia. Anatomic brain imaging studies have consistently shown patients with schizophrenia to have bilateral hippocampal volume reductions (7—9), and postmortem studies have confirmed these findings along with reduced neuronal size (10—12).
Adolescence appears to be a unique period of brain development in schizophrenia (13, 14), and changes during normal adolescence bring about hippocampal volume reduction (15). The mechanisms underlying hippocampal volume reduction in schizophrenia are unclear and could be related to genetic, environmental, antipsychotic medication, and/or illness-related factors (16, 17). To explore the contribution of a familial/genetic mechanism to the structural abnormalities, several studies have compared patients to their unaffected healthy siblings or other first-degree relatives (18, 19).
The results from these studies, and thus whether a reduction in hippocampal volume represents a familial/trait marker for schizophrenia, remain unclear. Table 1 in the present study provides an overview of studies examining hippocampal volumes in nonpsychotic relatives of adult-onset schizophrenia patients. Findings have been inconsistent, with six studies reporting smaller hippocampal volumes in first-degree relatives compared with healthy subjects, suggesting familial/genetic liability (16, 20—24). In contrast, five other studies failed to find any decrease in hippocampal volumes for unaffected siblings of adult patients (25—29) (Table 1). Studies in ultra-high-risk individuals also address the question of whether hippocampal volume reductions could be familial/trait markers and whether the changes could take place before the onset of psychosis. In the present analysis, the studies are also inconsistent, with four showing that volume deficits do not appear until after the onset of psychotic illness (30—33) and three finding ultra-high-risk patients to have decreased hippocampal volume (34—36). It is important to note that many subjects in these studies had various psychotic symptoms and were exposed to typical or atypical antipsychotics at clinical dosages lasting from a few days to approximately 1 month, and thus the effect of antipsychotics on hippocampal volume remains a confounding factor. As a whole, these studies suggest that hippocampal volumes may be differentially affected, depending on the stage and type of psychosis, but fail to provide convincing evidence about the use of hippocampal volume as a familial/trait marker.
Childhood-onset schizophrenia, defined as onset of psychotic symptoms before age 13 years and diagnosed using unmodified DSM-IV criteria, is a rare form of the illness that is continuous with its adult counterpart (13, 37) and shows a robust gray matter loss during adolescence that appears to be an exaggeration of the normal cortical gray matter developmental pattern (14, 38—41). We previously reported a moderate, nonprogressive reduction in hippocampal volume bilaterally (13, 42). Although there are salient volume reductions in the hippocampus associated with adult-onset schizophrenia, there have been no studies examining longitudinal hippocampal volume change in either the siblings of our patients or relatives of adult-onset patients.
In the present study, we investigated longitudinal development of hippocampal volumes in a large sample of childhood-onset schizophrenia probands, their unaffected healthy siblings, and healthy comparison subjects, all examined prospectively during childhood and adolescence using a fully automated, whole brain segmentation technique to determine hippocampal volume (43). Based on previous work, we hypothesized that hippocampal development in childhood-onset schizophrenia patients would show a nonprogressive bilateral hippocampal volume reduction. We further hypothesized that healthy siblings of childhood-onset schizophrenia probands would also demonstrate smaller and progressive reduction in hippocampal volume, and thus the trajectory of hippocampal development could be a familial/trait marker.
Childhood-onset schizophrenia patients were recruited nationwide and were diagnosed after inpatient observation that included a medication washout. Exclusionary criteria were medical or neurological illness, substance abuse, or an IQ <70 prior to the onset of psychotic symptoms. Further details are described elsewhere (44). All patients, along with their full siblings, were followed clinically with neurological rescan at 2-year intervals.
For this study, only childhood-onset schizophrenia patients (N=89 [198 scans]) and healthy full siblings of patients (N=78 [172 scans]) with two or more successive scans were examined. Siblings were interviewed using structured psychiatric interviews for axis I (using either the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia [SADS]  or the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children [K-SADS] ) and axis II (using the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders ) diagnoses. Siblings were considered healthy if they were free of any schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses, which included schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or any psychotic illness on axis I or paranoid, schizotypal, schizoid, or avoidant personality disorders on axis II (48).
Seventy-nine healthy comparison subjects (172 scans) were selected from a larger prospective study of normal brain development and were matched for age, sex, and scan interval to the childhood-onset schizophrenia patients and healthy siblings. Only comparison subjects with two or more successive scans were included. As with siblings, comparison subjects were free of lifetime medical or psychiatric disorders as determined by means of clinical examination and standardized interview. Psychiatric illness in a first-degree relative was also exclusionary. Further details are described elsewhere (49).
Imaging Processing and Analysis
T1-weighted images with contiguous 1.5-mm slices in the axial plane were obtained using a three-dimensional spoiled gradient recalled echo sequence in the steady state. Imaging parameters were as follows: echo time=5 msec, repetition time=24 msec, flip angle=45°, acquisition matrix=256×192, number of excitations=1, and field of view=24 cm. Head placement was standardized as previously described (50).
The image files in DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) format were transferred to a Linux workstation for analysis. Subcortical volumes were measured automatically with the FreeSurfer image analysis suite, which is documented and available online (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). A trained psychiatrist reviewed individual scans, and those with significant artifact or motion disturbance (childhood-onset schizophrenia group, N=7; healthy sibling group, N=4; healthy comparison group, N=4) were excluded from analysis. The automated procedures for subcortical volumetric measurements of different brain structures have been described previously (43, 51). This procedure automatically provides segments and labels for many brain structures and assigns a neuroanatomic label to each voxel in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volume on the basis or probabilistic information estimated automatically from a manually labeled training set. Briefly, this processing includes motion correction and averaging of multiple volumetric T1-weighted images (when more than one is available), removal of nonbrain tissue using a hybrid watershed/surface deformation procedure (52), automated Talairach transformation, segmentation of the subcortical white matter and deep gray matter volumetric structures (including the hippocampus, amygdala, caudate, putamen, and ventricles) (43, 51), intensity normalization, tessellation of the gray-white matter boundary, automated topology correction (53, 54), and surface deformation following intensity gradients to optimally place the gray-white matter and gray matter/CSF borders at the location where the greatest shift in intensity defines the transition to the other tissue class.
The segmentation uses the following data to disambiguate labels: 1) the prior probability of a given tissue class at a specific atlas location, 2) the likelihood of the image intensity given the tissue class, and 3) the probability of the local spatial configuration of labels given the tissue class. This technique has previously been shown to be comparable in accuracy to manual labeling (43) and has been demonstrated to show good test-retest reliability across scanner manufacturers and field strengths (55). However, all segmentations were visually inspected for accuracy prior to inclusion in the group analysis. Total hippocampal volume was calculated as the sum of the left and right hippocampal volumes for each study participant.
Demographic differences between groups were tested using analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi-square tests of independence for categorical variables. To examine group differences between the developmental trajectories of total, left, and right hippocampal volume measures, we used mixed-effect regression models. The dependent measures were individual hippocampal volumes; fixed effects included age (centered at the sample average age of 17.58 years [SD=4.6]), group, group-by-age, intracranial volume, and sex. Random effects included an intercept per person (to account for within-person dependence) and an intercept for a person nested within a family (to account for within-family dependence). Hypotheses for model building were tested with F statistics to determine the order (cubic, quadratic, or linear) of the developmental growth curves. We graphed fitted regression lines for the middle 80% of the age range in our data set. Group differences in intercept (at the average age) and slope were tested using t tests.
Demographic characteristics are shown in Table 2. The three study groups were well matched with respect to age, sex, and handedness. Across the entire study sample, there were significant group differences in each hippocampal volume measure at the average age (Table 3). Childhood-onset schizophrenia patients had a significantly smaller (6%—7%) hippocampal volume (total, left, and right) relative to comparison subjects and healthy siblings. On the other hand, siblings and comparison subjects had comparable total, left, and right hippocampal volumes at the average age (Figure 1).
Demographic Characteristics Among Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia Probands, Healthy Comparison Subjects, and Healthy Siblingsa
| Add to My POL
|Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia Patients (N=89)||Healthy Comparison Subjects (N=79)||Healthy Siblings (N=78)|
|Age (years)||Age (years)||Age (years)||Analysis|
|Magnetic Resonance Imaging||N||Mean||SD||N||Mean||SD||N||Mean||SD||F||df||p|
|Scan 1||89||14.9||3.2||79||14.9||4.7||78||14.9||6.0||0.03||2, 243||0.99|
|Scan 2||51||17.3||2.6||63||16.9||3.7||44||18.7||6.8||2.17||2, 155||0.12|
|Scan 3||34||20.0||2.8||33||19.6||4.0||31||21.1||6.8||0.82||2, 95||0.44|
|Scan 4||14||22.7||2.9||14||21.2||2.2||14||23.0||6.2||0.75||2, 39||0.47|
|Scan 5||7||24.8||3.4||5||24.7||3.1||5||22.9||2.6||0.61||2, 14||0.55|
|Scan 6||3||27.6||1.1||4||28.3||3.8||0.09||1, 5||0.77|
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Hippocampal Volumes (mm3) Among Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia Probands, Healthy Comparison Subjects, and Healthy Siblingsa
| Add to My POL
|Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia Patients (N=89)||Healthy Comparison Subjects (N=79)||Healthy Siblings (N=78)||Analysis|
Longitudinal Trajectories (Slopes) of Total, Left, and Right Hippocampal Volumes in Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia Probands, Their Healthy Siblings, and Healthy Comparison Subjectsa
a The graphs depict group-by-age interaction effects. Images represent the progression of hippocampal volume for the middle 80% of the data range, from age 12 to 24 years. Mixed-model linear regression for the total, left, and right hippocampal volumes are shown. Pairwise group differences in total hippocampal volume (top) at the centered age (17.58 years [SD=4.6]) were statistically compared using t tests. Statistically significant differences in volume were found when comparing the childhood-onset schizophrenia group with healthy comparison subjects (t=5.53, df=229.90, p<0.001) and the childhood-onset schizophrenia group with healthy siblings (t=—4.96, df=236.40, p=0.004). There were no statistically significant group differences in slope for any of the volume measures. Pairwise group differences in left hippocampal volume (center) at the centered age (17.58 years [SD=4.6]) were statistically compared using t tests. Statistically significant differences in volume were found when comparing the childhood-onset schizophrenia group with healthy comparison subjects (t=5.18, df=227.37, p<0.001) and the childhood-onset schizophrenia group with healthy siblings (t=—4.27, df=234.51, p=0.006). There were no statistically significant group differences in slope for any of the volume measures. Pairwise group differences in right hippocampal volume (bottom) at the centered age (17.58 years [SD=4.6]) were statistically compared using t tests. Statistically significant differences in volume were found when comparing the childhood-onset schizophrenia group with healthy comparison subjects (t=5.41, df=232.08, p<0.001) and the childhood-onset schizophrenia group with healthy siblings (t=—5.25, df=239.18, p=0.001). There were no statistically significant group differences in slope for any of the volume measures.
Longitudinal trajectories (slopes) of hippocampal volume for the three groups did not differ significantly. Each group had a negative linear volumetric trajectory over time, which was not significantly different from zero. Furthermore, for the total and right hippocampal volumes, the childhood-onset schizophrenia group had qualitatively steeper volume loss over time compared with the other two groups, but the slopes for the trajectories between the groups did not differ significantly. When individual groups were divided by gender, no statistically significant differences in total, right, or left hippocampal volume emerged for either volume amount or slope of the trajectories.
Healthy siblings of childhood-onset schizophrenia probands had no hippocampal volume deficits relative to healthy comparison subjects. However, childhood-onset schizophrenia patients showed bilateral fixed deficits in total hippocampus volumes. Similarly, the linear trajectories (slopes) across age for total, left, and right hippocampal volumes in siblings as well as childhood-onset schizophrenia probands did not differ from those of healthy comparison subjects.
These findings extend our previous reports of fixed total hippocampal volume deficits in childhood-onset schizophrenia patients (13, 42) in a much larger sample. The volume deficits, 6%—7% at the average age, are larger than those seen in cross-sectional studies of adult schizophrenia (4%—5%) (17, 31), which is consistent with the clinical evidence that childhood-onset schizophrenia represents a more severe phenotype of the illness. Since hippocampal volume deficits appear early in childhood-onset schizophrenia and are comparatively nonprogressive, these findings also support a static hippocampal lesion suggested by the animal models of schizophrenia (56—59).
Contrary to our a priori hypothesis, healthy siblings of childhood-onset schizophrenia probands showed no hippocampal volume loss. Previously, mostly cross-sectional MRI studies in healthy siblings as well as first-degree relatives have shown inconsistent findings (Table 1). Similarly, many studies of ultra high-risk individuals have also failed to show consistent hippocampal loss prior to the onset of psychosis (30, 32, 33, 60). Many of these studies, including those of high-risk populations, have included patients who have some schizophrenia spectrum symptoms or have been exposed to antipsychotic medications, which could have resulted in some of the inconsistencies. In a separate pilot analysis, we attempted to address this issue by comparing hippocampal (total, left, and right) volumes in medication-naive siblings of schizophrenia spectrum patients (N=15 [24 scans]) with volumes in healthy comparison subjects (N=15 [24 scans]). The siblings, which were probably comparable to an ultra high-risk group with schizotypal symptoms, also failed to show hippocampal volume reduction (p=0.7 [unpublished data available upon request from A. Mattai]). Overall, these findings strongly suggest the state-/disease-dependent nature of hippocampal volume loss. Strengths of the present study are the large sibling cohort, which enabled the selection of truly healthy comparison subjects, and the longitudinal nature of the study, which strengthened the stability and significance of the findings.
The effects of antipsychotic medication on hippocampal volume have been addressed by a few studies. The single longitudinal study (N=107) showed unchanged anterior hippocampal volume in patients regardless of cumulative antipsychotic dose (61). A cross-sectional study (N=56) showed that atypical antipsychotics rather than haloperidol were associated with larger hippocampal volumes after controlling for disease severity (62). On the other hand, studies of hippocampal volume in antipsychotic-naive and minimally medicated first-episode schizophrenia patients showed that hippocampal volume deficits were present at the onset of schizophrenia prior to any treatment (9, 63). All of our patients were exposed to antipsychotic medications, but the volume deficits remained fixed throughout the age range, suggesting minimal medication influence at least on the developmental trajectory, which we have also seen in the cortex (64). Although the effect of medications cannot be definitively ruled out with these observations, combined with the lack of volume loss in siblings, they support evidence that medications have minimal effect on hippocampal volume loss. A direct comparison of medicated and medication-naive childhood-onset schizophrenia patients may address this issue more definitively, but drug-naive childhood-onset schizophrenia patients are almost impossible to recruit.
Postmortem work investigating morphometric hippocampal changes in schizophrenia suggests that the illness reduces hippocampal neuronal size. Benes et al. (12) measured pyramidal neuron size in the posterior hippocampus and found reductions of 13%—18% in regions CA1—CA4 in schizophrenia patients relative to comparison subjects. Correction for the effects of age, fixation interval, and neuroleptic exposure did not alter the results. Similarly, Arnold (65) reported reductions in neuronal size in hippocampal subfields that mediate interactions with the cortex, thus possibly altering the neural circuits (66). Processes occurring during embryonic development and early childhood, such as neuronal migration, neuron enlargement and differentiation, and apoptosis in brain maturation, all have some bearing on hippocampal cytoarchitecture and neuronal arrangement (65). While it is not clear which of these factors may cause volume loss in the hippocampus, the nature of these neuropathologic changes suggests that at least part of the hippocampal disease process occurs during early development.
Given that the primary development of the brain occurs during fetal life, adverse environmental variables in early life could affect hippocampal development. Across environmental variables, obstetrical complications are one of the strongest predictors of risk for schizophrenia (67—70). There is persuasive evidence to suggest that obstetrical complications, particularly perinatal hypoxia and prenatal infections, are related to smaller hippocampal volumes in schizophrenia (71, 72). Furthermore, in animal models, prenatal- and birth-related hypoxic insults have been demonstrated to result in hippocampal neuron damage and a reduction in hippocampal cell number (73, 74).
Studies of hippocampal volume in monozygotic and dizygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia have also bolstered support for the idea that hippocampal volumes are differentially modulated by environmental factors to a greater degree when compared with healthy individuals (75, 76). However, a small retrospective chart study found no evidence for increased obstetrical risk in childhood-onset schizophrenia versus sibling comparison subjects (77). Collectively, such work highlights that unique environmental events can significantly influence hippocampal volume in patients with schizophrenia.
A model of the developmental pathology of the hippocampus in childhood-onset schizophrenia could consist of an early environmental risk factor, such as perinatal hypoxia or prenatal infections, imparting a constitutional vulnerability to the hippocampus. Studies have shown that the hippocampus is particularly susceptible to damage as a result of stress (78, 79). During early adolescence, the hippocampus regulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis that releases cortisol and consequently augments dopamine activity in certain brain regions, including the mesolimbic system (80, 81). Increased stress could lead to an increased demand placed on the hippocampus, eventually leading to an exaggerated response to stress and more hippocampal damage in a positive feedback system. Given the pronounced prefrontal cortical deficits seen in childhood-onset schizophrenia (38), the prefrontal cortex may have limited ability to take over functions, such as working memory, from the hippocampus, further increasing functional demands and leading to hippocampal damage. This framework could explain a hippocampal diathesis-stress model in which normal maturational processes and exaggerated responses to early stress lead to abnormal hippocampal development that could be static with continued illness burden.
Our findings have several broad-ranging implications in terms of prevention and treatment. First, given the potential significant environmental contribution to hippocampal volume in schizophrenia, measures to decrease exposure to the environmental influence could result in a reduction in the incidence of illness in the population. For example, Suvisaari et al. (82) found that a decline in bacterial illnesses and initiation of immunization programs may have led to a decline in the incidence of schizophrenia in Finland since the 1950s. In addition, prenatal and perinatal monitoring may also decrease the risk of schizophrenia in some genetically at-risk individuals (83). As hippocampal pathology likely begins and progresses in early brain development, measures to attenuate or reverse volume loss should be initiated early. The hippocampus is one of few brain structures with the ability to generate new neurons throughout its life (84). Although there is limited work linking schizophrenia to decreased hippocampal neurogenesis or on whether normalization of neurogenesis would improve atrophy (85), recent investigations suggest that exercise may promote hippocampal plasticity and improve memory (86, 87). While many obstacles need to be overcome, future translational studies should focus on early interventions, possibly in the fetal period, as a way to improve hippocampal development and potentially prevent or delay onset of illness.
A major limitation to this study is that we did not investigate hippocampal shape abnormalities that may have reflected on heterogeneous changes within the hippocampus. Shape and subregional analyses of the hippocampus within this population are ongoing. Another limitation of the study is the unknown bias of national recruitment for this very rare patient population that may favor healthy families and thus a population with lower genetic risk. Nonetheless, this study highlights that hippocampal deficits are not strongly related to genetic factors and may represent an important intermediate disease phenotype in childhood-onset schizophrenia.