Advanced Search

The American Journal of Psychiatry, VOL. 159, No. 3

Letter to the Editor | March 01, 2002

Meta-Analysis and Psychiatric Genetics

STEPHEN J. PITTELLI, M.D.

Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:496-496. 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.3.496

Article

References

text A A A

To the Editor: In the article by Stephen V. Faraone, Ph.D., et al. (1), I find the use of meta-analysis to substantiate their claim perplexing. Meta-analysis may be a useful tool when examining studies with reasonably similar results, but using meta-analysis "to reconcile conflicting findings" (p. 1052) is a dubious endeavor. A significant majority of the studies in their meta-analysis either do not substantiate or contradict the claim that the 7-repeat allele of the dopamine D₄ receptor gene is seen in higher prevalence in individuals with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). I certainly agree that the authors’ conclusion is "counterintuitive" (p. 1055). Notwithstanding that, I have a few criticisms of the meta-analysis itself.

1. While the authors ruled out the possibility that the results of an initial study (2) were false positive, using that same study in the meta-analysis along with attempts to replicate it is "stacking the deck." The prevalence of refuted initial false positives from molecular genetics studies of mental illnesses approaches 100% (3). Thus, this initial study should not be included in the meta-analysis (even if it is the most strongly positive study).

2. Despite the impressive mathematical demonstration of nonbias, I suggest there are a few potential areas of bias. First, Dr. Faraone included one of his own studies in the meta-analysis. Second, I can hardly imagine more biased groups to cull data from than "colleagues presenting such data at national meetings" and "the molecular genetics e-mail network" (1, p. 1053). Also, the authors stated, "Unfortunately, neither type of study has consistently confirmed the putative association between ADHD and the DRD4 7-repeat allele" (p. 1052). Unfortunate for whom?

3. Even if "it is reasonable to attribute differences among studies to chance fluctuations" (p. 1055), this does not account for the possibility that the studies regarding the D₄ receptor gene 7-repeat allele simply provided the most false positives in comparison with molecular genetic studies of ADHD as a whole. A controlled meta-analysis of all molecular genetic studies for ADHD would be interesting; a null hypothesis should first assume that no such genes exist and that all significant findings to date, both positive and negative, are the result of "chance fluctuations."

4. The argument that ADHD is "mediated by many genes acting in concert" (p. 1052) is rather circular in that it is based primarily on the complete failure of molecular genetic studies to find such genes and replicate those findings. Whether or not ADHD genes truly exist (individually or acting in concert) remains an unproven assumption.

To claim that there is a link between ADHD and the D₄ receptor gene 7-repeat allele "or some nearby gene" (p. 1052), a consistent replicable protocol must first be developed. A "small" association noted in a meta-analysis of conflicting studies does not meet the burden of proof.

References

Faraone SV, Doyle AE, Mick E, Biederman J: Meta-analysis of the association between the 7-repeat allele of the dopamine D₄ receptor gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158:1052-1057[PubMed][CrossRef]

LaHoste GJ: Genetics of complex behavioral traits: obesity, dopamine, and mood. Mol Psychiatry 1996; 1:302[PubMed]

Faraone SV, Tsuang MT, Tsuang DW: Genetics of Mental Disorders. New York, Guilford, 1999

LaHoste GJ: Genetics of complex behavioral traits: obesity, dopamine, and mood. Mol Psychiatry 1996; 1:302[PubMed]

Faraone SV, Tsuang MT, Tsuang DW: Genetics of Mental Disorders. New York, Guilford, 1999

CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.

Submit a Comments

Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of JBJS editorial staff.

* = Required Field

Comment Author(s)*(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)

Example: John Doe

Affiliation & Institution*

Comment Title*

Comment*

Cancel

Print
E-mail

Recipient(s) will receive an email with a link (good for 72 hours) to 'Meta-Analysis and Psychiatric Genetics' and do not need to have American Journal of Psychiatry account to access the content.
Your Name:*
Example: John Doe

Email Address:* CC Me:
Enter your valid email address. Example: jdoe@example.com

Recipient's Email Address:*
Separate multiple email address with semi-colons (up to 5).

Subject:* 's American Journal of Psychiatry: 'Meta-Analysis and Psychiatric Genetics'
Subject for your email.

Message:
(Optional, message will truncate at 1000 characters)

Processing your request... Please Wait...

Copyright © in the material you requested is held by The American Psychiatric Association (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to The American Psychiatric Association's Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to The American Psychiatric Association's Privacy Policy for further information.

Copyright © American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.
Share
Get Citation

STEPHEN J. PITTELLI; Meta-Analysis and Psychiatric Genetics. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;159(3):496-496.

Download citation file:

RIS (Zotero)

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

Copyright © American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.
Reprints