The patients were shifted after an acute trial of ECT to either of two groups on the basis of clinical response, i.e., "the core depressive symptoms necessitating hospital admission were much or very much improved"
+(1, p. 1962). This definition of symptom improvement, apart from not being terribly objective, did not confidently and clearly differentiate "response" from "recovery." Imprecision in terminology in distinguishing clinical response from recovery has been a major caveat in ECT research
+(4). Because of this not-so-precise definition of recovery and the possible presence of patients who were slow to respond
+(5), the patients may have had a premature termination of acute ECT.