The author reviews the decision made by the California Supreme Court in
the case of Tarasoff v. the Regents of the University of California, et
al., which stipulated that therapists must warn authorities specified by
law as well as potential victims of possible dangerous actions of their
patients. He states the basic points of the Northern California Psychiatric
Society's amicus curiae brief on behalf of the university regents and
discusses the issues raised by the Tarasoff decision vis-- 53a-vis the
mental health profession and its dealings with potentially violent
individuals.Abstract Teaser