0
Article   |    
MULTIPLE THERAPY IN PRIVATE PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE
LEO ALEXANDER; MERRILL MOORE
Am J Psychiatry 1957;113:815-823.
View Article Information
Director, Neurobiologic Unit, Division of Psychiatric Research, Boston State Hospital; Clinical instructor in Psychiatry,, Tufts University Medical School.
Research associate in the Laboratory of Human Relations, Harvard College, Cambridge, Mass.
text A A A
PDF of the full text article.
Abstract
This paper is based on our experiences in combining forces to treat certain of our private patients (N = 29) in individually-planned therapeutic programs, generally consisting of an integration of psychotherapy and physical-treatment procedures, one therapist devoting himself exclusively to psychotherapy, the other to physical treatments and supplementary psychotherapy as new psychodynamic constellations emerged during the treatment. On the whole, these 29 patients comprised a particularly treatment-resistant group of severe mood disorders. The fact that nevertheless 75% of them achieved either full or social recovery, a figure statistically not significantly different from that of 61% for a group of 201 unselected psychotic and borderline states treated by a single therapist with physical treatment methods and/ or psychotherapy, suggests that the particular difficulties encountered in the present group of patients were adequately met by the treament method described.We were interested to find that where the relation between referring therapist and patient was strong and positively toned, it was in no way disrupted or diminished either by any form of physical treatment (ECT, insulin coma, even lobotomy) or by the subsequent relationship with the second therapist. This became particularly striking when after some progress in physical treatment, as the patient's ego became able to assert more effective controls and defenses, the patient frequently thrust the second therapist into a sort of combined ego-superego role, attempting to impress him with an increased grasp of reality and improved mastery in many situations, all the while retaining an unchanged relationship vis a vis the first therapist, with whom the patient remained more concerned with id derivatives and inclinations. This was not due to deliberate role playing or areas of special interest on the part of the therapists but rather to a shift in the role in which the patient cast one of the therapists, usually the one carrying out the physical treatment, in response to the patient's own treatment needs arising out of the reawakening of his ego strength in response to the physical treatment. This also comes quite strikingly to the fore when one therapist alone carries the patient from psychotherapy through a series of physical treatments, thus often obscuring the fact that the original more primary way of relating to the therapist remains at all times an open avenue of additional communication; this perhaps adds particular strength and effectiveness to the multiple therapy described here.Choice of psychotherapist, following physical treatment, was left entirely to the patient, and aside from the usual influences arising from transference and countertransference factors, it was noted that patients frequently turned away from that therapist who had the better relationship with the more conflictful figures in their lives. It was as though they felt that under these circumstances the therapist could not really sympathize with their point of view, but would remain an ally of the hated or ambivalently regarded figure. Frequently, however, patients seemed able to tolerate continued combined treatment from the two therapists, deriving different but complementary benefits from each.The great flexibility of the multiple-therapy situation proved especially useful in treating cases where marital conflict was a prominent issue. Each spouse could have his own therapist, and yet there was a joint meeting and confrontation on their problems in an atmosphere often charged with an almost revivalist emotionalism and permissiveness. Not only did patients often seem to derive special benefit from the small-group emotional dynamics, but they seemed to feel that, as before a jury, they would obtain fair, impartial hearings, that their individual rights would be protected. This feeling was also evident in relatives who had become anxious and doubtful during a patient's treatment, but who were considerably reassured by being able to confer with both therapists in a roundtable discussion.Abstract Teaser
Figures in this Article

    Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
    Sign In Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
    Sign In to Access Full Content
     
    Username
    Password
    Sign in via Athens (What is this?)
    Athens is a service for single sign-on which enables access to all of an institution's subscriptions on- or off-site.
    Not a subscriber?

    Subscribe Now/Learn More

    PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-IV-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

    Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing PsychiatryOnline@psych.org or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

    +
    +
    +

    CME Activity

    There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
    Submit a Comments
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe



    Topic Collections
    Psychiatric News
    PubMed Articles
    Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review.
    JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2005 Oct 26
    Nonpharmacologic approaches to substance abuse treatment.
    The Medical clinics of North America 1997 Jul