The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Drs. Michels Reply

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.156.3.498b

To the Editor: We appreciate Dr. Krahn’s close reading and thoughtful comments.

The medical consultants believed that the patient’s coagulopathy was consistent with his account of a self-administered overdose of warfarin. In view of the 6-year interval since his last thrombosis and the absence of physical findings, the consultants recommended discontinuing the anticoagulation, which was done.

The possibility of a factitious disorder is interesting. The treating staff felt that his depressive syndrome, his psychodiagnostic profile, his improvement with antidepressant medication, and perhaps most striking, his postdischarge postcard would argue against this, but of course it is always possible that they were “taken in.” Perhaps more important, the diagnosis of factitious disorder describes a behavior that is always associated with serious character pathology and related psychodynamics. The treating staff, and our report, focused on these aspects of the history. As we stated, “his character pathology [became] even more apparent,” and “[h]e managed to extract more inpatient treatment from the system than the vast majority of patients with this level of pathology” (p. 1601). Whether the specific behaviors that resulted from his underlying psychopathology and psychodynamics were conscious and manipulative, as the diagnosis of factitious disorder suggests, or unconscious enactments, as the staff believed, is less important when their psychodynamic origins are so primitive. From a clinical perspective, it is more important that the staff be able to tolerate, contain, and respond appropriately to them.