The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

Is the "live patient" interview on the boards necessary?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.140.7.890

Study of American Board of Psychiatry certification examinations over a 2-year period revealed differences between audiovisual and "live patient" interview grades. Of 2,236 psychiatrists examined in psychiatry, 1,367 (61%) received concordant scores on their audiovisual and "live patient" examination hours and 1,165 (52%) received identical grades. Agreement about pass/fail decisions was even higher (80%). Where scores were not identical, two out of three candidates scored higher on the audiovisual section, prompting the conclusion that the two examination formats may test somewhat different skills or carry a different weight in the judgment of most examiners. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that these differences must continue to be tested for.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.