The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.131.5.523

When 100 patients were evaluated by a therapist, DIAGNO III (a computer program for psychiatric diagnosis), and the senior author, the computer's and therapist's diagnoses were in agreement in 65 cases; the senior author's diagnoses agreed with the computer and therapist in 56 of the cases. The authors discuss the situations in which the computer can be most helpful in diagnosis and also point out some factors that reduce the potential of computer analysis. They suggest that despite the difficulties in computerizing data and in simulating the diagnostic process, computers can be of aid in the field of psychiatry as they have already proved to be in other medical specialties.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.