The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.131.2.135

In psychiatry today eclecticism is encouraged by the wide range of therapeutic techniques available, the complex needs of patients, and the many political systems (family, school, job, etc.) in which they are enmeshed. Although it is possible to learn a variety of techniques during and after residency without an integrated theory of eclecticism the practitioner may have difficulty deciding when and how to use them. General systems theory has been suggested as a theoretical basis for eclectic psychiatry, but it has several shortcomings. The author concludes that until an adequate theoretical basis is formulated, eclectic choices must be characterized as "artistic" rather than scientific—a serious limitation in the development of practice.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.